~alcinnz/haskell-stylist

ref: 7d540c43481903333757c1232c6fdd6d7626b623 haskell-stylist/psuedoclass-plans.md -rw-r--r-- 1.8 KiB
7d540c43 — Adrian Cochrane Compose together rule stores. 5 years ago
                                                                                
a86d830d Adrian Cochrane
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Currently Stylish Haskell lacks support for psuedo-classes/elements, which is a significant shortcoming. So what would it take?

To start the following psuedoclasses need to be defined by the caller (mostly in implementing forms), either before or after the CSS is evaluated:

* active
* checked
* default
* defined -- selects builtin elements or "custom elements".
* disabled
* empty -- since I do not directly reference children, just parents.
* enabled
* focus
* focus-within
* hover
* indeterminate
* in-range
* invalid
* optional
* out-of-range
* read-only
* read-write
* required
* target
* valid
* visited

The pseudoelements meanwhile need to be applied after selection:
* before
* after
* cue
* first-letter
* first-line
* selection

:link, :lang(), & :root/:scope can compile down to existing selectorFuncs. 

Furthermore there's those psuedoclasses which tests the position of the element in the list.
* first-child
* first-of-type
* last-child
* last-of-type
* only-child
* only-of-type
* :nth-child()
* :nth-last-child()
* :nth-last-of-type()
* :nth-of-type()
:first-child, :first-of-type, :nth-child(), :nth-of-type() can easily be tested by traversing prev pointers.
But for only/last psuedoclasses I'd need to store additional counts.

Furthermore there's functional psuedoclasses which takes additional arguments:
* :not(selector)
* :where()/:is()
I need to compile these down myself.

I'd be tempted to output a structure mapping psuedoclasses to style objects,
after having compiled some of those as part of the selector itself.
Though the issue with that is that it prevents popular solutions for creating JavaScript-free webpages.

I guess I'd add a psuedoclass field to elements, and there's already a hook
where embedders can decide how they want to deal with it.

Sorry this document is a bit rambly!